| User | Post |
|
12:21 pm March 14, 2010
| ktraver97ss
| | Roselle, IL | |
| Daily Driver | posts 93 | |
|
|
Ill pop this sections cherry real quick.
I just ordered some ngk plugs for the TJ and was wondering if there is anything else I can do to get her running better. I see there are no wires, just that big long coil pack thingy, no fuel filter that I can find either. Anything else I can do to optimize the 4.0s performance and efficiency?
It has a fresh air filter and oil change already.
|
03 TJ 2"bb, 33×10.5 KM2s, JKS quicker discos
02 Silverado 1500 Z71 ec/sb 5.3L
97 Camaro SS – 34k mile garage queen
|
|
|
1:32 pm March 14, 2010
| oddball
| | |
| Mud Slinger | posts 1190 | |
|
|
Not sure if you were around when I had a couple of conversations regarding spark plugs, but I hope you bought the regular NGK's. Two people last night pretty much confirmed what I read on Rubicon Owner's Forum that these old fashioned "tractor motors" don't like platinum plugs.
And since there is no PCV valve, as long as the coil packs & rail are in good condition you're pretty much set, as I've been led to believe. Proper tire pressure is key to better fuel milage too.
I need to get some NGK plugs too.
|
|
|
1:44 pm March 14, 2010
| ktraver97ss
| | Roselle, IL | |
| Daily Driver | posts 93 | |
|
|
Post edited 6:44 pm – March 14, 2010 by ktraver97ss
I went with the V-power NGK Part #3459, copper I believe. $2.15 ea on Rockauto.com
|
03 TJ 2"bb, 33×10.5 KM2s, JKS quicker discos
02 Silverado 1500 Z71 ec/sb 5.3L
97 Camaro SS – 34k mile garage queen
|
|
|
5:58 pm March 14, 2010
| notoriousDUG
| | Chicago | |
| Mall Crawler | posts 214 | |
|
|
How can a motor 'not like' a platinum plug? A platinum plug should show no real change in performance, it is not to make the plug work better but to make it last longer, f'n things are a waste of money if you ask me…
As long as you are buying a premium plus within the proper heat range and reach you are going to be just fine plug wise no matter what you are doing with the possible exception of running a multiple discharge style ignition in which case I recomend the Delco Rapid fire plugs.
As for making the 4.0 run well over all it is the same as any other engine; the more air and fuel you can ge in and burned the better off you are going to be. Make sure to dielectric up the connections on the coil packs when you put the new plugs in and beyond that and keeping the air cleaner clean there is not much you can do stock. The factory air box and tube are pretty restrictive but you are not going to see any real gain changing them either.
|
|
|
|
|
6:18 pm March 14, 2010
| Electric Stooge
| | DDO West/Platteville | |
| Moderator
| posts 835 |  
|
|
|
tho Do's
the proper exhaust, (4.0s are usually 2.5")
clean contacts for the plugs, with proper gap
short ram, or cold air intake, anything to increase the surface area of the filter to get more clean air into the motor faster
larger throttle body
normal maintenance
the don'ts
put a 3" exhaust on (loose your low end)
change octanes (tends to cover up problems like a bad cam sensor)
the iffys
electric fan upgrade
performance chip
synthetic oil (the 4.0 is a tractor motor made to run forever on conventional)
|
Mitch(1 of 3 stooges)
00' XJ, 5.5" Long arm, 32×11.5×15, 4.0l
If something electrical doesnt work right, throw a relay or 2 on it!
|
|
|
7:33 pm March 14, 2010
| oddball
| | |
| Mud Slinger | posts 1190 | |
|
|
notoriousDUG said:
How can a motor 'not like' a platinum plug? A platinum plug should show no real change in performance, it is not to make the plug work better but to make it last longer, f'n things are a waste of money if you ask me…
I wondered the same thing but there are literally dozens of Rubicon owners who all agree the platinum plugs don't work well in their 4.0's and since the overwhelming majority say not to run them, I'm not going to. End of story.
|
|
|
8:08 pm March 14, 2010
| notoriousDUG
| | Chicago | |
| Mall Crawler | posts 214 | |
|
|
oddball said:
notoriousDUG said:
How can a motor 'not like' a platinum plug? A platinum plug should show no real change in performance, it is not to make the plug work better but to make it last longer, f'n things are a waste of money if you ask me…
I wondered the same thing but there are literally dozens of Rubicon owners who all agree the platinum plugs don't work well in their 4.0's and since the overwhelming majority say not to run them, I'm not going to. End of story.
I believe the Rubicon forum is where there was once a guy telling people he could feel the loss or gain of 3HP as well so I take everythign there with a grain of salt.
Moot pointbecause they are a waste anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
10:01 am March 15, 2010
| ktraver97ss
| | Roselle, IL | |
| Daily Driver | posts 93 | |
|
|
Thanks for all the input and suggestions. I dont mind switching the plugs out more often, so Ill stick with copper. I have run the ngk's in my SS and Silverado for years now with no issues. I also run all Amsoil synthetic lubricants in all my vehicles and have had 0 issues, even increased mpg in my fathers TSX, and one of my customer's H2. Didnt notice any difference when switching the TJ over, but at the same time I put on the 2" spacers and 33" tires so Im sure it just kinda balanced it out.
I plan on doing a snorkel in the future, so Ill wait till then to upgrade the tb and cai. So, this motor wouldn't benefit that much from headers with ORY into a madrel bent 2.5" ss exhaust system? Does anyone knwo if HPTuners can tune these 4.0L? So if I did an ORY I can delete the O2s and adjust speedo for larger tires, etc. Getting rid of the crank driven fan and replacing with e-fans does interest me, ill have to look into this upgrade more.
|
03 TJ 2"bb, 33×10.5 KM2s, JKS quicker discos
02 Silverado 1500 Z71 ec/sb 5.3L
97 Camaro SS – 34k mile garage queen
|
|
|
10:17 am March 15, 2010
| notoriousDUG
| | Chicago | |
| Mall Crawler | posts 214 | |
|
|
One thing to keep in mind when you are getting down to making motors for off roading is the type of power you want and why.
Unless you are planning on becoming a mud runner desert racer you want the power band low and don't really need a ton of power, you need tons of gearing. Some of the early winners on the rock racing circuit with 4 bangers with inertia rings and crazy crawl ratios; even today light rigs with steep gears are doing just as well as a pig of a rig with a fire breathing V8.
But then again what works rock racing and what works wheeling for recreational purposes are two entirly different things…
Some of the best wheeling rigs I have owned and know when it comes to just wheeling for fun used stock motors! My CJ-7 with a tired 258 and stock gears worked great. Cooter's TJ is still a bone stock 4.0. Zach's insane Samurai uses a factory 4 cyl with stacked t-cases. JoeZ ran his 'runner on a 42" tire with a stock 22RE. Tom at the Cliff's runs stock motors in his samis with deep t-case gears. My 6.2L diesel Blazer was awesome and made like 90HP on a good day! I had a XJ with a fire breathing V8 and in some cases I think it was more of a pain then it was a help; if I built that again I would have kept the 305 that was in it when I bought it or found a starter rig with a 4.0 in it and used the SM465 behind that.
The poop you see on the internet videos and in the pictures is awesome, but it's comp stuff and wheeling like that in trail groups is just stupid; there is no reason for it so why spend the money for power you may never use? You want a really fun rig that is a joy to drive and fun on the trials? Keep it tuned up and well maintained and put all the speed parts money into gearing and parts to make the suspension work better and you will get many, many times the bang for your buck and far more enjoyment then you ever would from the performance mods.
Strong motors cost money, take more maintenance and are more fickle when it comes to behavior; why add the headache when you could just build a sweet rig on a stock motor that will never hurt for power if you drive it well?
|
|
|
|
|
11:26 am March 15, 2010
| ktraver97ss
| | Roselle, IL | |
| Daily Driver | posts 93 | |
|
|
My reason for wanting more power is to increase its on-road performance without hindering its off-road performance. With the addition of the 33" KM2s its really a dog on the street, and I would like to give it a little more pep. I understand the benefit of gearing over raw power when it comes to the trails and I have no intention of trying to make big power out of the 4.0. I just was looking to find out what some of the standard modifications are commonly done to the 4.0 to give it a little help. I assumed the usual things like cai, etc, but I was surprised that headers/exhaust are not as common.. Every motor is different and that why I wanted to get some tips from people with more experience on these motors. Ill just get the plugs done and start shopping snorkels/cai. Any specific ones you guys would recommend?
|
03 TJ 2"bb, 33×10.5 KM2s, JKS quicker discos
02 Silverado 1500 Z71 ec/sb 5.3L
97 Camaro SS – 34k mile garage queen
|
|
|
11:34 am March 15, 2010
| notoriousDUG
| | Chicago | |
| Mall Crawler | posts 214 | |
|
|
You will see more of your power back in traffic from a re-gear then you will ever find messing with the motor. I would take a 2.5 w/ 4.56 gears and 35's over a 4.0 w/ 3.73 gears as a daily driver; that's real talk. You want the best of everything 4.56 that thing now on the 33's and just get used to not going fast on the highway.
Plugs I recomend Delco but as long as youa re buying a name brand premium plug you are not going to go wrong, just stay away from 'novelty plugss'
You want to make real power with the 4.0 do the same stuff you would to any motor for low end grunt but in my opinion with the HO 4.0 you are really not going to see any real gains without real mods to the engine, bolt on stuff is not going to do much for you they are a pretty well optimized engine as it sits.
|
|
|
|
|
11:43 am March 15, 2010
| ktraver97ss
| | Roselle, IL | |
| Daily Driver | posts 93 | |
|
|
Cool beans, thanks for the help. If Im gunna re-gear Ill probably wait and choose my gear when I go D60/14bolt. My reasoning behind that is if I do gears, im gunna do lockers, if I do lockers, im gunna start breaking axles, so until all that is planned and ready Ill just keep her running strong.
What gear ratio comes in my 03 Sahara stock?
|
03 TJ 2"bb, 33×10.5 KM2s, JKS quicker discos
02 Silverado 1500 Z71 ec/sb 5.3L
97 Camaro SS – 34k mile garage queen
|
|
|
1:04 pm March 15, 2010
| notoriousDUG
| | Chicago | |
| Mall Crawler | posts 214 | |
|
|
ktraver97ss said:
Cool beans, thanks for the help. If Im gunna re-gear Ill probably wait and choose my gear when I go D60/14bolt. My reasoning behind that is if I do gears, im gunna do lockers, if I do lockers, im gunna start breaking axles, so until all that is planned and ready Ill just keep her running strong.
What gear ratio comes in my 03 Sahara stock?
The whole axle snapping thing is nothing but lies perptrasted by bad drivers.
Cooter ran locked on a D30 with 297 joints running 4.56 gears and a Q78 (36x10.5x15) and has, I am pretty sure, never broken an axle. Remeber the u-joint on a late model D30 is the same as that on a D44 and the shaft diameter is almost the same as well; your real weak point is the ring and pinion compared to the D44 and when was the last time you heard of a D30 R&P blowing? Plus if you compare a high pinion D30 to a D44 you are evening things out even more.
The D35 is weak but you can make it live, I have seen them live with a 35 or 36" tire for a surprising amount of time and with the ease of a D44, 8.8 or 8-3/4" swap you can have the proper width and bolt pattern for next to nothing; heck you can even buy all kinds of bracket kits for it and not have to make anything yourself! I don't think Cooter has broken anything on the D30/8-3/4 combo he runs and he didn't even need to change his wheels!
Unless you are planning to run a 38" plus tire there is just no call for thatkindof axle nonsense.
|
|
|
|
|
6:09 pm March 15, 2010
| jknutter
| | DDO North Chapter | |
| Moderator
| posts 567 | 
|
|
|
Electric Stooge said:
tho Do's
short ram, or cold air intake, anything to increase the surface area of the filter to get more clean air into the motor faster
I've been doing a ton of research on the Cold Air Intake – and everything I read says not to waist your money unless you are installing it on a small 4 cylinder road racer with modified exhaust.
First the oiled and dry filters in a CAI are rated the worst in filtering out dust particles and allow them to pass into your intake which is not good on the trail unless you are in front.
Second they do not help your performance until you are in your upper third of RPM's which is a place you'll never be while wheeling.
Finally they do not devert water as a stock air box will – one splash in the creek can ruin your day.
Need proof – go to Jeepforum and post a question about installing a CIA on your vehicle. The Stock designed air box will provide all the air you need unless you are running a header or less restrictive exhaust system. Remember a motor is nothing more than a air pump – if you make it go in easier it has to come out easier or there is no benefit. Yes I made the mistake of buying a CIA all that it did for me was sound cool. It actually decreased my milage because I'd stomp on it more just to hear it. After reading the reports on how bad a CIA actually filtered the air I was happy to put my stock system back in and kicked the CIA to the curb.
Don't take my word search google and make your own decision.
Just another of my 5 cents.
|
|
|
|
|
7:01 pm March 15, 2010
| notoriousDUG
| | Chicago | |
| Mall Crawler | posts 214 | |
|
|
FYI, if you have a YJ disregard all of that because they have a very low airbox intake and tend to suck water.
Actually I think the air box on a TJ is to low and an open element on a short tube up high with a splash guard is a better idea.
I would be interested to see the filter data because if the filters are of the same material you should see the same filtering capability regardless of shape and location.
|
|
|
|
|
10:01 pm March 15, 2010
| Electric Stooge
| | DDO West/Platteville | |
| Moderator
| posts 835 |  
|
|
|
Jeff Knutter said:
Electric Stooge said:
tho Do's
short ram, or cold air intake, anything to increase the surface area of the filter to get more clean air into the motor faster
I've been doing a ton of research on the Cold Air Intake – and everything I read says not to waist your money unless you are installing it on a small 4 cylinder road racer with modified exhaust.
First the oiled and dry filters in a CAI are rated the worst in filtering out dust particles and allow them to pass into your intake which is not good on the trail unless you are in front.
Second they do not help your performance until you are in your upper third of RPM's which is a place you'll never be while wheeling.
Finally they do not devert water as a stock air box will – one splash in the creek can ruin your day.
Need proof – go to Jeepforum and post a question about installing a CIA on your vehicle. The Stock designed air box will provide all the air you need unless you are running a header or less restrictive exhaust system. Remember a motor is nothing more than a air pump – if you make it go in easier it has to come out easier or there is no benefit. Yes I made the mistake of buying a CIA all that it did for me was sound cool. It actually decreased my milage because I'd stomp on it more just to hear it. After reading the reports on how bad a CIA actually filtered the air I was happy to put my stock system back in and kicked the CIA to the curb.
Don't take my word search google and make your own decision.
Just another of my 5 cents.
I was actually part of that discussion on jeep forum. and it was really inconclusive because people were just trying to bash K&N. turned out that most people didnt know the intake actually looked like. at the end of it, most people agreed with the larger surface area, but to not use a K&N filter because it lets more dust in.
and yes… I have done the same with mine when I first got it. then again with my free flowing exhaust.
but around 55mph, i get about 18-20mpg (around town with my foot out of it averages 13… foot in it 11)
now I have no idea what I was getting stock because I didnt keep track of it. but with a 4.5" lift, and 32 with stock gearing. I gotta be doing something right
but he is right, its all your own decision
|
Mitch(1 of 3 stooges)
00' XJ, 5.5" Long arm, 32×11.5×15, 4.0l
If something electrical doesnt work right, throw a relay or 2 on it!
|
|
|
7:30 pm March 20, 2010
| Truth
| | |
| Daily Driver | posts 73 | |
|
|
ktraver97ss said:
Cool beans, thanks for the help. If Im gunna re-gear Ill probably wait and choose my gear when I go D60/14bolt. My reasoning behind that is if I do gears, im gunna do lockers, if I do lockers, im gunna start breaking axles, so until all that is planned and ready Ill just keep her running strong.
What gear ratio comes in my 03 Sahara stock?
I've wheeled my jeep with a manual, 4.0, 4.56 gears, 33" tires (sometimes 36's), locked front and rear, and stock axles for 10 years. A well built 60/14 bolt combo would be darn near bullet proof, but unless you're driving a high horsepower rig with 38" plus sized tires it's serious overkill. Keep in mind that without REALLY tall tires you will loose a drastic amount of ground clearance, and be dragging diffs all day long.
Your gear ratio depends alot on what tire size was stock, manual or auto, and engine size. I'm assuming 4.0 since you have a sahara, and I'd guess your ratio at 3.73. But there is a tag on the diff cover that will tell you for sure.
|
|