| User | Post |
|
7:35 am
April 27, 2010
|
Keith
| | Elgin | |
| Mall Crawler | posts 224 | |
|
|
I've been looking at newer Wranglers and wonder if the JK would be too wide for the tight paths at the Cliffs. They are 74 inches wide while a TJ is 67 and a Cherokee is 70. On the other hand a Toyota FJ is 75 inches. My Tracker is only 64 inches and was very easy to get through the trees.
|
2002 Mitsu Montero Sport
2005 Wrangler LJ
|
|
|
9:16 am
April 27, 2010
|
notoriousDUG
| | Chicago | |
| Mall Crawler | posts 214 | |
|
|
No, it will be just fine.
|
|
|
|
|
4:36 pm
April 27, 2010
|
oddball
| | |
| Mud Slinger | posts 1190 | |
|
|
You'll fit, but know you will be more prone to trail rash than a TJ. At least that is what JK owners I've some across (in person and online) have said.
|
|
|
5:29 pm
April 27, 2010
|
Electric Stooge
| | DDO West/Platteville | |
| Moderator
| posts 835 |  
|
|
|
if you r worried, just do the wide sliders, that way you will hit those before the trees, most of the rash was low at the cliffs from what we saw. so you should be good
|
Mitch(1 of 3 stooges)
00' XJ, 5.5" Long arm, 32×11.5×15, 4.0l
If something electrical doesnt work right, throw a relay or 2 on it!
|
|
|
9:48 pm
April 27, 2010
|
grantypanties218
| | rockford | |
| Grocery Getter | posts 49 | |
|
|
its not only about width also consider the length and wheel base
idk how wide my truck is but i have a longer length and wheelbase than a zj andxj they got around obsticles easier than me at the cliff due to i would have to make way wider turns in order to get my booty around a tree
|
|
|
3:02 am
April 28, 2010
|
Xjay98
| | |
| Mall Crawler | posts 393 | |
|
|
You'll be fine, Keithert. Always expect to bend, scratch and break stuff when you're on the trail.
|
|
Login 
Register 
Search 
Home
Print this Post 
